Welcome to the Whakapapa Club Forums where you will find a wealth of information. You are free to browse the forums, but if you wish to comment or add requests, you must register, which is quick and easy and you can even use your Facebook Login.
Once you have signed up and posted either a reply or a new post it will not appear in the forums until it has been approved – this is to stop spam from appearing and keeping our Whakapapa Club Forums relavent for Whakapapa only.
If someone helps you don’t forget to acknowlege them.
If the current monarch is the maori king, then why does he flap a british flag called new zealand like the rest of us? Does he have new zealand flapping just above his head on his license, like the rest of us, or does he have his own? And if he has his own flag, should his people be flapping that same flag? Just trying to figure out, where titles like King and Queen actually fit in the maori world.
Kia Ora koe!!!
U realy dont understand the meaning of Kingitanga too Maoridom.
the King does not flap the new zealand flag he flaps his own flag which is the maori monarch coat of arms Te Paki O Matariki!!!!!.
And Tainui Waikato flap his mothers flag the kaahu.
And the history of the titles king and queen in maoridom dates back to the first king whom was chosen by maori chiefs of the motu. they had a choice of titles to give to this new leader, those choices were: Ariki taungaroa
Ariki o nga ariki
now these chiefs didnt want an normal title to be given to this person so they choose the title king just like that of england.
you should actualy read and reasearch more before posting things that you could find the answers to
A king in his own kingdom with his people should be flapping the same flag, and should be on their identification papers, or am I that naive to be thinking like that? How are Maori ever going to do the self-governance thing, flapping a british flag and not their own. New Zealand is a Flag, that's all it is, and it flaps just above your head, being the flagpole, but the ground the flagpole stands on, is something else.
You realy should learn more about why the maori monarch was established and yes you are being naive.
We realy dont have a choice flying the pakeha flag dont we? thats why the kings flag is only folowen on his maraes.
its not like the government is going to fly any maori flag at the parliament or on the parliemant or even get it printed on passports and drivers license for Maori only.
I have a fla pole at mu home but it doesnt i dont fly that crappy flag.
Maybe your king should say something about the matter. And why don't you tell me in your own understanding why the maori monarch was established. Because, I'm not sure if you saw it on tv, but the maori queen bowed down to the pakeha queen, and the pakeha queen, dubbed your maori queen, a DAME. Now, with shit like that happening, where o where do the titles king and queen fit in the maori world.
Well you people do have rights. Are you telling me, you ain't allowed to have your flag flapping above your head on any of your identification papers? Grow some balls and challenge the current government on the matter. And I disagree with you Taiwhakaea, saying this issue is not really worth it, because it is. And if we don't fight for our rights, our younglings and theirs and theirs and theirs and theirs and theirs are forever going to have New Zealand flapping above them, forever oppressing them, forever ignoring them.
Kia ora tatou katoa,
The word "kingi" in Maori is a transliterated word deriving from the English word "king".
The word "kingi" came across at that time to be a much more natural choice than words like rangatira and ariki. This is because the role that this person would fulfill was more than that of an "ariki" (remembering that an ariki is the highest role that a person can be born into) but also one that would not trample on the mana of the ariki and rangatira throughout the island.
We must remember that at that time there was no concensus of being one people throughout Aotearoa since each iwi and its subsidiary hapu were all fiercely independant of one another. So in ancient times it wasn't safe for a Taranaki person to waltz around into Ngati Porou territory. However, curiously Pei Te Hurinui Jones notes in Nga Iwi o Tainui that approximately before 1500 circa people could travel around the island without having their intentions challenged so perhaps the people of that era were more unified its just that for a brief moment in Maori history disunity took over.
The kingitanga was a kaupapa in response to the squatters known as Pakeha in the 1800s began to arrive in large numbers and wanted to take land off of Maori. The only way to consolidate Maori land ownership at that time was to unite and have a figure head who could lead a united charge against Pakeha because the chiefs knew that "united we stand divided we fall".
Several hui around the motu were held about this matter of electing a king (thus making the system similar to that used on the fictional planet called Naboo in Star Wars). The main criteria for selection was on whakapapa, and so a motu wide search began in finding who had the appropriate whakapapa (i.e. to see which one of the chiefs could link to the most tribes on the island). There were many contenders but most if not all turned down the offer since they understood not only the burden of such a kaupapa would bring but also how they were linked genealogically.
Now Gemini, in regards to what you're saying about the beloved Te Atairangikaahu bowing to Queen Elizabeth II...
What Queen Elizabeth II did was a wise thing. She knows of the struggles that Maori are going through but because of the way the political system works now she is constrained from doing much. However, she has done what she could, and that was giving the title of dame to Te Atairangikaahu. By that single act alone she recognized the nobility within Te Atairangikaahu and made accorded her status in Pakeha society that placed her above the Queen's servants.
Also Gemini, it is polite for royals to recognize each other. Even Queen Salote, Tonga's queen, recognized Queen Elizabeth II by not sheltering herself when the rain came during a parade in London in the 1950s. By doing this, she had acknowledged that Queen Elizabeth II was indeed a queen as it would have been rude for her to act as though as if she, Queen Salote, is equal to the sovereign in the land that she visits. If a monarch goes to see another monarch in another land, generally, although they are still a monarch, they have to respect the mana of that monarch because they are on that monarch's turf.
Kia ora Tane. Pono in the recognition part, acknowledging each other as equal, in Title only. And pono in standing down when in another land, yet still maintain Title. But, I don't see the wisdom in dubbing another who holds the same Title, with a much lesser Title, than what she already holds. Surely the Title Queen has a higher status than a Dame! Please explain the wisdom in this act, to your own understanding.
The wisdom being that Te Atairangikaahu was made more royal and held more status than any mere prime minister that has made it into office during her lifetime in the Pakeha world. The Queen already acknowledge Te Atairangikaahu's sacredness but she knew that others (like the common street monger) did not so the best way to "force" the issue is to award a title that commands respect no matter what.